World Heritage Nominations: Justification For The Inscription of Cultural Landscapes
Durée de l'évènement:
Page d'accueil du programme:
Event focal point email:
Event focal point Contact Number:
Autres infos sur l'évènement:
The registration is closed
Deadline for registration: 12 Mars 2014
The UNITAR Series on the Management and Conservation of World Heritage Sites, launched in 2003, has thus far comprised ten annual Workshops held in Hiroshima and one in-country Workshop in India. The Series, with over 330 Alumni to date, offers a set of innovative approaches to heritage conservation, including:
- A values-based management approach examining the significance of the sites to be conserved
- The fusion of cultural and natural heritage management
- The recognition of both the tangible and intangible aspects of heritage sites
- Focused analysis of specific areas of the nomination process
The specific objectives of the 2014 Workshop will be to:
- Review the key elements of the World Heritage Convention, incorporating updates and current trends
- Explain the principles of “Values-Based Heritage Management”
- Examine best practices and lessons learned in preparing nominations
- Examine the key elements of the nominations process which focus upon the justification for inscription, particularly for cultural landscapes
- Through reality-based practical exercises, extract key concepts and common issues for given sites
- Enhance long-term peer learning and exchange among the participants.
Contenu et structure
Lectures will be delivered by representatives of UNITAR, UNESCO, ICCROM, IUCN, and ICOMOS, and will include:
- Principles and Objectives of the World Heritage Convention
- The Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention
- World Heritage Nomination and Evaluation Processes: From Tentative List to Committee’s Decision
- Justification for Inscription: Identifying and understanding potential Outstanding Universal Value
- Criteria for the Assessment of Outstanding Universal Value
- The Nomination Format
- Tips on Writing and Preparing the Nomination File
Underscoring the theoretical introductions and analyses presented, Study Tours form an integral part of the training methodologies utilised by UNITAR. Visits will be made to the World Heritage Atomic Bomb Dome and its attendant museums, as well as to the World Heritage Itsukushima Shinto Shrine.
Key to the facilitation of learning at the Workshop is a major Practical Exercise whereby participants work in small groups to analyse real world Case Studies and apply the theoretical and practical knowledge gained in the Workshop.
The participants (up to 30) will consist of:
- Those involved in the preparation of World Heritage nominations;
- Potential or current World Heritage site managers
- Natural/cultural conservation specialists and trainers
- Decision makers and government officers
- Representatives of academic institutions, think-tanks, and civil society
- The USD 1000 participation fee covers all accommodation costs (Check-in: Sunday 13 April – Check-out: Friday 18 April), as well as all tuition, material, study-tour, breakfast and lunch costs for the duration of the programme (15 - 18 April).
- Please note that all travel costs to and from Hiroshima are the responsibility of the participant and/or their organisation.
- These Case Studies will be distributed to all faculty, as well as being incorporated into the Workshop literature; please ensure this document does not exceed the maximum page limit.
- Please submit this document in Word format to firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Please ensure all documents are saved with the following name format: WHS14-country-familyname-document, e.g.: WHS14-newzealand-smith-casestudy.
- Some selected Case Studies may be used at the Workshop. In such cases, the participant who submitted the Case Study will act as a ‘data provider’ to the team.
- Case studies related to the focus of the workshop, cultural landscapes, are especially welcome.
- This should include the description/definition of the spatial area. The Site should preferably be a site included on a national tentative list, or not listed at all but a site that the registrant believes to have “Outstanding Universal Value”. Sites already included on the World Heritage List can also be considered. Please identify the values of the Site.
- This should contain a description of the existing management system (international, national, local, indigenous, etc.). Please analyse whether or not the existing system and overall trends protect and promote the values of the Site and avoid (potential) threats to the Site’s values.
- The Case Study should suggest one or more discussion topics or projects in order to tackle the problems or threats to the Site. Only if the Case Study is selected will topics or project proposals be discussed and elaborated in plenary or by working teams; therefore the Case Study does not need to contain a full project document and maps or data do not need to not be presented at this stage.
- Public - Sur Inscription
- Public - Candidature
- Privé - sur Invitation
- Open to register/apply
- Face à face
Toutes les langues